“大调解”行动与“大调解”机制——以成都市大邑县为观察样本  

Grand Mediation Campaign and Grand Mediation Mechanism:A Case Study of Dayi County in Chengdu

作　　者：潘伊川[1] 洪磊 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031 [2]成都市大邑县人民法院,四川成都611300

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2009年第6期114-121,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：大调解制度依托调解这种传统纠纷解决模式,以各种社会与政府资源的整合为手段,近几年来取得了较大的发展。对当今大调解工作机制的运作情况及实际效果进行实证分析研究结果表明,大调解机制在减轻法院工作压力等方面发挥了作用。但就纠纷当事人而言,较多的人倾向于法院调解,大调解机制的运行效果不够理想。改进的措施在于,充分发挥其他调解作为自发秩序的自治力量,强化其作用。the grand mediation mechanism relies on intermediation, a traditional model of dispute solution. By using various social and governmental sources, the mechanism has been greatly developed in recent years. After a case study of the effect of grand mediation mechanism in practice, the research suggests that the mechanism effectively relieves the pressure on courts. As to the parties, most of them are inclined to the intermediation of the court, so that the effect of grand mediation mechanism is not satisfactory. The key to improve it lies in strengthening its funciton by fully exerting other dispute solution as the power of spontaneous order.

关 键 词：大调解 纠纷解决 调解机制 自发秩序 

分 类 号：DF82[政治法律—法学]