论不当得利自体法  

Study on Proper Law of Unjust Enrichment

作　　者：蒋奋[1] 金彭年[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学宁波理工学院,浙江宁波315100 [2]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《河北法学》2010年第2期160-163,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：英美学者的"不当得利自体法"理论,主张涉外不当得利之债应由其自体法支配。在不同的情势下,自体法可以是原因合同关系准据法、不动产所在地法、得利地法或不当因素产生地法。虽然学界对上述观点褒贬不一,但其对我国不当得利冲突立法有着现实的借鉴意义:原因合同关系准据法主义不仅与不当得利制度的地位与作用相匹配,而且可以解决因识别差异导致的准据法偏差问题;不动产所在地法若随着物权冲突规则的发展而扩展至与动产有关的不当得利,则亦可避免因识别差异导致的准据法偏差;而至于得利地法,则已经在大陆法系国家的早期立法中得到体现。此外,鉴于不当得利制度的核心是得利原因之不正当,故将"不当得利发生地"理解为"不当因素产生地",并作为指引不当得利准据法的连结点之一,亦可为我国立法所用。Anglo-American scholars advocate such theory that the liability of unjust enrichment should be governed by proper law. Proper law of unjust enrichment can be the law of the place of enrichment, Lex Situs, Lex Causa Condictionis, or alternatively, the law of the place where the events which allegedly render such an enrichment unjust occurred. Although there are academic criticism and praise on proper law theory, it can still be consulted by P. R. C. legislature. Lex Causa Condictionis was sensitive to the variety of circumstances in which such claims arise. Lex Situs should apply to realestate-related unjust enrichment so that improper applicable law arising from different characterization will not be applied. Besides, law of the place where enrichment occurs has been adopted early by continental law system legislatures. Since the unjust factor is the key element of unjust enrichment claims, Lex Loci Conditionis can be interpreted as the law of the place where the events which allegedly render such an enrichment unjust occurred and may be legislated as P. R. C. conflict rules.

关 键 词：不当得利 自体法 原因合同准据法 不当因素 

分 类 号：DF5[政治法律—民商法学]