从波兰尼到格兰诺维特:“社会人”对“经济人”假设的反拨与超越——兼议新经济社会学的最新进展  

Backwash and Beyond: the Assumption of"Social Man"vs"Economic man": From Karl Polanyi to Mark Granovetter——The Latest Developments of the New Economic Sociology

作　　者：臧得顺[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院社会学所,北京100102

出　　处：《甘肃行政学院学报》2009年第6期11-20,共10页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute

基　　金：中国发展研究基金会奖学金资助

摘　　要：作为西方经济学理论体系的硬核",经济人"假设从形成起就不断受到"社会人"假设的反拨与挑战,促使经济学理论体系不断调整自己的保护带,推动整个经济学学科理论的发展。波兰尼的"嵌入"理论对"经济人"假设的批判是颠覆性的,为后来的学者建构以"社会人"假设为基础的经济社会学理论做好了铺垫。格兰诺维特等建立的新经济社会学首先把人视为"社会人",再考察其置身其内的社会关系和制度空间,进而分析其经济行为的激励因素,对传统的理性选择、效用驱动的经济模型所提出的那些理论进行补充解释甚至是替代解释。这种基于相同研究对象而引起的学科交流和对话已势在必行。As the hard core of western economic theory, the 'economic man' assumption has been contradicted and challenged by the 'social man' assumption since it formatted, which promotes economic theory to have adjusted its protective belt to promote the development of economics discipline. Polanyi's ' embedded' theory, as the base of economic sociology which takes 'social man' assumption as its hard core, is a subversive critique to 'economic man' assumption. Based on 'social man', New Economic Sociology (NES), established by Granovetter and others, regards men as 'social men' firstly, and examines their social relations and institutions, and then analyzes the incentive mechanism of economic behavior. NES supplementally and even alternatively explains some theories proposed by economic models driven by traditional rational choice and utility. Thus, communion and dialogue has become inescapable to those subjects which are the same studying objects of the two disciplines.

关 键 词：经济人 社会人 波兰尼 格兰诺维特 经济社会学 

分 类 号：C91[经济管理]