检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁军利[1] 赵静[1] 周志国[1] 蔺强[1] 支静[1] 耿文慧[1] 郭丽华[1]
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2010年第1期1-4,共4页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:评价护理干预对放疗患者生存质量的影响。方法:将108例放疗患者随机分为治疗组(55例)和对照组(53例),治疗组入院开始护理干预,如心理护理和家庭支持、建立良好的护患关系、加强健康教育、不良反应的护理、功能锻炼等;对照组行常规护理。分别于疗前、疗中、疗后、疗后1个月采用EORTC癌症生命质量核心量表(QLQ-C30)对两组患者进行问卷调查。结果:治疗组生存质量下降程度明显低于对照组,QLQ-C30 15项生存质量领域评价指标中有11项有统计学意义(P<0.05),提示治疗组生存质量优于对照组。结论:有效的护理干预可以改善患者放疗期间的生存质量。Objective :To evaluate the effect of quality of life about nursing intervention to radiotherapy patients. Methods :There were 108 patients who were randomly divided into two groups,55 patients in treatment group and 53 in control group. The patients in treatment group were given nursing intervention from admission, which included psychological nursing, family support, better relationship of nurse and patient, health training, nursing to radiation toxicities, function training, and so on. The patients of control group accepted conventional nursing. Used the EORTC QLQ - c30, the patients quality of life of two groups were observed at pre- radiation, mid-radiation ,afterradiation, and after one -month radiation. Results:The quality of life of control group became worse than that of treatment group during radiation period. It was 11 among 15 indexes according to QLQ - c30 that there Were significant (P 〈0. 05 ). Conclusion:The nursing intervention can improve the quality of life of patients during radiation period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31