检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学,山东济南250100 [2]南京大学,江苏南京210093
出 处:《山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报》2009年第6期4-6,共3页Journal of Shandong Administrative College and Shandong Economic Management Personnel College
摘 要:参与式民主是行政听证制度的理论基石之一,它在听证制度的代表性、行政听证的范围上等为行政听证制度的发展和改革提供全新的视角。我国行政听证制度的建构和完善虽然在一定程度上提升了行政机关决策的公开性和透明度,但仍存在着诸如行政听证制度主体代表性和公开性不足、适用范围狭隘、主体地位不平等等众多缺陷。行政听证制度的完善有赖于国家与社会关系的调整,需要激发新闻媒体活力并扩大听证范围。Participatory democracy is a basic theory of the system of administrative hearings, which provides a new perspective of the representation and the scope of the system of administrative hearings that promotes its development and reform. The construction of China' s system of administrative hearings enhances the openness and transparency in decision-making, but there are still some defects, such as lack of openness, the narrow scope of application, lack of representation, inequalities between the government and members of the public. The improvement of the system of administrative hearings depends on the adjustment of the relationship between state and society, the vitality of news media that should be motivated and expanding the scope of the system of administrative hearings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222