检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李俊[1] 方四新[1] 戴震[1] 张鹏川[1] 朱新忠[1]
机构地区:[1]合肥市疾病预防控制中心,安徽合肥230061
出 处:《安徽预防医学杂志》2009年第6期448-450,463,共4页Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的识别、分析某工程存在的职业病危害因素,为控制职业病危害提供依据。方法采用现场职业卫生学调查、职业病危害因素检测、职业性健康监护等定性、定量的方法。结果该工程的总平面布局、生产车间内的设备布局、建筑卫生学、职业病危害防护设施等基本符合《工业企业设计卫生标准》的要求,各岗位的职业病危害因素的浓度或强度均在职业接触限值以内,所采取的控制职业病危害因素的补充措施和应急救援设施基本可行,员工未出现职业性健康损伤。结论工程的职业病危害控制措施基本有效。Objective To identify and analyze the occupation disease hazard factors of phase 1 program of a company with annual production of 1.8 million cubic meters timbers and evaluate the control effectiveness of occupation disease hazard.Method The spot occupational hygiene investigation,the test of occupation disease hazard factors,occupational health supervision,etc were used.Result The layout of phase 1 program and workshops,the architecture hygiene and protection facilities of occupation disease hazard were basically in accordance with the 'Hygiene Standard of Industrial Enterprise'.And the density or intensity of occupation disease hazard of different posts was below the limit of occupational exposure.Also,the complementary measures of controlling the occupation disease hazard and emergency rescue facilities were basically feasible.And no occupational health damnification appeared.Conclusion The control measures of occupation disease hazard of phase 1 program were basically effective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117