防范“贫困化增长”:FDI甄别与区域差异性检验  

Avoiding "Immiserizing Growth":Screening and Empirical Research on FDI

作　　者：刘渝琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学贸易与行政学院,400044

出　　处：《国际贸易问题》2010年第1期101-109,共9页Journal of International Trade

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金一等奖资助(20070410209);首届中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目:FDI负效应与贫困化增长(项目编号:200801224)

摘　　要：本文以防范"贫困化增长"为基点,在划分数量型FDI与质量型FDI基础上,构建以"福利条件"为标准的福利指数,通过1992-2007年东、中、西部地区16个指标反映FDI数量效应与质量效应面板数据的实证检验,揭示了两种类型的FDI对福利影响的区域差异性,表现出东、中、西部的不同变化特征。另外,1998年以前引进的FDI表现出数量型福利效应居于主导地位,1998年以后呈下降趋势,恶化了FDI的福利水平。相反,质量型FDI对福利的贡献度却逐渐增大。因此,我国在外资政策导向上更应注重对"质"的把握,实现从数量型FDI到质量型FDI的转变,以防范贫困化增长的可能。Based on the ＂Immiserizing Growth＂ theory and the establishment of FDI screening mechanism, this paper establishes the welfare indexes which are screened by welfare condition. By empirically testing the panel data of the east, central and western region from 1992 to 2007 which include 16 indexes and reflect quantitative effect and qualitative effect, the paper reveals that different styles of FDI will lead different influence on welfare in different region. In addition, quantitative effect of FDI is dominant before 1998 and quantitative effect deteriorates the welfare after 1998. Contrarily, quality FDI contributes to welfare growing gradually. So, We should pay more attention to ＂quality＂ and realize the transform from quantity FDI to quality FDI so as to avoid the immiserizing growth.

关 键 词：外商直接投资(FDI) “贫困化增长” 福利条件 

分 类 号：F752[经济管理—国际贸易] F832.6[经济管理—产业经济]