检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学公共管理学院、医改研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《中华医院管理杂志》2010年第1期17-20,共4页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
摘 要:目的比较分析我国当前与既往医改政策形成过程中公众参与的程度变化特征。方法运用政策分析法对近年来不同阶段中的医改政策形成过程进行比较。结果医改的传统政策形成过程主要在政府部门内部纵向循环产生;现阶段医改政策制定形成过程不仅通过了多部委联合工作和独立的研究机构参与平行研究的横向循环所产生,还多次广泛征求了社会各界的建议。结论当前医改扩大了公共政策形成的参与主体构成,表现出公共政策形成过程中公众参与程度的提高,反映了公共管理变革的趋势。建议应进一步建立稳定的公众参与机制以适应社会发展的要求。Objective Comparison and analysis of public participation in China's ongoing health reform policy process with that in the past. Methods Comparison and analysis of public participation in China's ongoing health reform policy process with that in the past. Results Traditionally, policies of health reforms were mainly formed via vertical and circular communication within government departments engaged. In contrast, the latest policy formation process not only benefits from horizontal communication between the ministries, but also invited independent researchers for parallel studies, in addition to frequent solicitation of public opinions. Conclusions The current health reform wins over a greater part of the public into the policy formation process. This increased public participation reflects the trend of public administration reform. A formal and stable mechanism is recommended to ensure public participation in policy formation process.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.114.165