检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海医科大学医学技术评估研究中心
出 处:《中国计划免疫》1998年第5期263-267,共5页Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
摘 要:本文介绍了用特尔斐法对口服脊髓灰质炎(脊灰)疫苗(OPV)进行综合效果评价的研究过程,共邀请了35位专家进行咨询,2轮回表率分别为94.29%和96.97%。通过建立OPV的综合效果评价指标体系,选择出2个一级指标和12个二级指标。专家结果经等级一致性检验,P<0.001,说明专家的评价结果在等级上的一致性程度高。糖丸疫苗和液体疫苗的综合效果评分分别为0.620和0.864。结果表明:液体疫苗的综合效果评价要优于老生产线生产的糖丸疫苗。This paper presents the research process of evaluation on OPV’s comprehensive effectiveness by Delphi consultant method. 35 experts were invited to consult. Two questionnaire’s return rate were 94.29% and 96.97% respectively. By setting up index for evaluating OPV’s comprehensive effectiveness, 12 quotas were selected. The result was tested by rank consistence, p<0.001, and it showed that result of experts’ evaluation had a higher degree of consistence on rank. Total scores of new liquid OPV and sugarcoated OPV were 0.864 and 0.620. respectively. It demonstrated that comprehensive effectiveness of new OPV was better than that of sugarcoated OPV which is manufactured by old productive line.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7