检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李玉玲[1] 张华[1] 陈雪清[1] 吴燕君[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科北京市耳鼻咽喉科研究所耳鼻咽喉头颈科学教育部重点实验室(首都医科大学),北京100730
出 处:《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》2009年第12期679-681,共3页Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30572027;30772408);首都医学发展基金(#2005-3052);北京市自然科学基金项目(7022007);国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2007BAI18B12;#2008BAI50B01)联合资助
摘 要:目的比较开放式和非开放式助听器验配效果的差异。方法采用SADL问卷和IOI-HA问卷对开放式助听器及与其条件相当的非开放式助听器验配者进行效果评估,并比较其配戴效果的差异。结果听力损失程度及类型相同的患者,开放式助听器的使用满意度明显优于非开放式助听器。结论开放式助听器因其在消除堵耳效应、改善噪声环境下言语辨别能力、外观及配戴舒适度等方面的优势,将会被大家广泛接受。OBJECTIVE To investigate the hearing aid outcomes with open-and closed-canal fittings.METHEDS The patients with open-and closed-canal fittings were measured by SADL and IOIHA and the scores were compared.RESULTS The subjects with open-fittings were significantly more satisfied with their hearing aids than that with closed fittings.CONCLUSION Because of reduction of occlusion and improved speech understanding in background noise,figure advantage and physical comfort,open-fittings will be accepted by more and more audiologists and hearing impaired people.
分 类 号:R764[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177