检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]桂林电子科技大学信息科技学院,广西桂林541004 [2]桂林电子科技大学商学院,广西桂林541004
出 处:《工业工程》2009年第6期38-42,共5页Industrial Engineering Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(07082001);广西青年科学基金资助项目(0728092)
摘 要:选取上游层面VMI模式各参与者为研究对象。考虑实施上游层面VMI模式后,订货(配送)主动权的转移导致订货(配送)策略的不同,以及制造商对各零部件需求速率的不同导致其对各零部件的订货周期也不一致的情况。通过建立数学模型,对实施上游层面VMI模式前后各企业的经济效益进行比较,探讨实施VMI且制造商销售价格不变时,各供应商是否存在合理的销售价格涨幅区间,该区间的价格既能弥补供应商因管理制造商零部件库存多消耗的成本,也能使各制造商和供应商的经济效益都有所提高,实现共赢,为各企业更加长久的合作提供理论依据。Vendor managed inventory (VMI) strategy can be applied between: 1 ) part suppliers and final product manufacturer; and 2) final product manufacturer and retailers. The former is at the upstream in the supply chain and we call it VMI at upstream segment that is addressed in this paper. A mathematical model is developed to analyze if both the part suppliers and the final product manufacturer can be benefit from VMI. It is found that the suppliers can increase prices in some extent to get more profit, while the manufacturer can reduce inventory cost so it can get more profit without increasing its product prices. Thus, win-win goal can be achieved. By analyzing the price increase intervals for the suppliers, win-win condition is presented.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38