试论我国刑事审判认证模式  

On the Chinese Judging Evidence System in Criminal Procedure

作　　者：肖良平[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西教育学院政法系,江西南昌330029

出　　处：《江西教育学院学报》2009年第6期54-58,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education

基　　金：江西省社会科学规划项目<我国刑事审判认证问题研究>阶段性成果;编号:09FX210

摘　　要：世界法制史上先后出现了三种刑事审判认证模式,其中法定认证、自由认证分别演进为英美法系的严格规则主义和大陆法系的自由裁量主义。两大法系刑事审判认证模式各有优缺点,并呈现相互结合的发展趋势。我国现行的刑事审判认证模式为完全自由主义认证模式,但其问题也是十分明显的。所以,我国应当选择严格规则主义和自由裁量主义相结合的刑事审判认证模式,并完善相关的配套制度。There are three modes of judging evidence system in the history around the world, among which the statutory one and discretionary one have evolved into the strict rules of the Anglo-American law system and the discretion of the Continental law system respectively. The two modes of judging evidence both have advantages and disadvantages in the meanwhile, and tend to combine with each other. Chinese current mode of judging evidence is the absolute discretion with obvious disadvantages. Therefore, China should adopt the mode which combine the statutory and discretionary system, and perfect the relevant regulations.

关 键 词：认证模式 法定认证 自由认证 自由裁量主义 严格规则主义 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学] D90