检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《湖南中医药大学学报》2009年第11期70-71,78,共3页Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的比较全麻复合硬膜外麻醉与单纯全麻在腹腔镜手术气腹后对血流动力学的影响。方法选择80例ASAI-II级择期腹腔镜手术的患者,随机分为全麻复合硬膜外组(A组)和单纯全麻组(B组)各40例,观察两组麻醉期间一般指标的变化。结果两组患者在麻醉后和气腹后在SBP、DBP、及HR上均有显著变化,而B组较A组变化差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论全麻复合硬膜外麻醉在腹腔镜手术中更能提供可靠稳定的血流动力学的变化。Objective To compare general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia alone pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery after hemodynamic effects. Methods 80 cases of ASAI-II level elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly divided into general anesthesia combined with epidural group (A group) and general anesthesia alone group (B group),each 40,were observed during anesthesia in general indicators changes.Results 2 groups of patients after anesthesia and gas belly SBP, DBP, and HR were significantly on the change, while changes in B group than in group A significant difference (P〈0.05).Conclusion The general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery can provide more reliable and stable hemodynamic changes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28