检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]峨眉山市人民医院,四川峨眉山614200 [2]四川大学华西医院呼吸内科,四川成都610041
出 处:《西部医学》2010年第1期117-118,共2页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的探讨急性呼吸道感染立即使用抗生素与不使用抗生素在治疗效果中的优缺点。方法对55例急性呼吸道感染患者随机分为立即与不使用抗生素两组,观察其临床效果。结果40例(72.7%)不用抗生素的患者均获得痊愈,14例(25.5%)立即使用抗生素也获得痊愈,1例疑似肺炎衣原体肺炎收住院。结论急性呼吸道感染患者不给予抗生素与立即给予抗生素相比,临床效果相似。Objective To explore the advantages and disadvantages of immediate or absent using of antibiotics for eases with acute respiratory tract infections. Methods One hundred and eighty-six cases with acute respiratory infections were randomly divided into the two groups. One group was treated with immediate using of antibiotics, and the other with non-using of antibiotics. The difference of clinical effect was obversed and analysed. Results Among the 55 patients, completed the whole following-up and treatment, 40 cases(72.7%)were cured by treated without using of antibiotics, while 14 cases (25.50%) were cured by the immediate using of antibiotics. Conclusion Clinical effect of immediate or absent using of antibiotics for patients with acute respiratory infections is similar.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117