中国崛起的认识论及其叙事衍生  

The Epistemology of China's Rise and Its Narrative Derivatives

作　　者：石之瑜[1] 张登及 

机构地区：[1]台湾大学政治学系,台北10002 [2]中正大学战略研究所

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2010年第1期37-51,共15页World Economics and Politics

摘　　要：从自我认同与群体归属两种需要的分析视角,作者得出了四种观察中国与"非中国"之间关系的视野:国家、亚洲、文明与天下。其中,从中国的角度出发,观察"非中国"的视野主要是国家与天下。如果继续按照自我认同与群体归属两种需要的区分,我们可得出国家权力、霸道、主权身份以及"中心-边陲"四种叙事的文本。简言之,看待"中国崛起"不是一件纯粹的"客观"之事,而是涉及观察者的群我关系之深层需要。"中国研究"不仅是一个应该适应国情并随之调整的方法论问题,而且它还涉及"知识"形成的前提,亦即中国与"非中国"关系所涉及的群我关系。群我关系的形成与认知须靠文化形塑,进而使行为主体形成对中国崛起的认识角度与文本选择。Reading the rise of China is more than theoretical or interpretive. It is an affective engagement,pertaining particularly to passion and anxiety. The resulting Sinicization is accordingly the recombination of discourse and effect in and outside China. The paper draws wisdom from psychoanalysis. It explores the deep motivation behind the practice of a social relationship embedded in the needs for self-centrism and group belonging,from which four different discursive approaches to the rise of China can be derived,each in its own way associated with the effects of opportunity and threat. They are 'nation state,' 'civilization,' 'Tianxia,' and 'Asianism.' Chinese narrators take Tianxia and 'nation state' as their discursive strategies in response to the external view on the rise of China. Both strategies are mediated by self-centrism and group belonging and evolve into four possibilities-national interests,imperialism,sovereignty and center-periphery. The last possibility has attracted enthusiastic response in China lately,but it has also been re-appropriated by social science concepts such as soft power and social capital,to the distorted effect that cognitive misrepresentations are unavoidable.

关 键 词：中国崛起 天下 民族国家 文明 亚洲主义 

分 类 号：D820[政治法律—政治学]