检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周毅[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州大学社会学院
出 处:《中国图书馆学报》2010年第1期93-99,共7页Journal of Library Science in China
摘 要:采用文本解读的方法,对现有信息法律文本进行解读,系统总结和反思了我国信息立法的基本价值导向,希望有助于明确今后信息法治建设的思路。研究发现,《著作权法》、《信息网络传播权保护条例》、《个人信息保护法(专家建议稿)》等法律文本体现了以信息权利保护为中心的立法价值导向;而《政府信息公开条例》、《保密法》、《档案法》、《图书馆法(草案)》等则体现了以信息义务规定为中心的立法价值导向。笔者认为,我国应确立以信息权利保护为价值导向的信息立法体系。The paper adopts the method of text interpretation to read information legal texts. It summarizes and reflects on the value orientation in information legislation. The author hopes that this research can clarify the ideas of the legal system establishment. The research finds out that the Copyright Law, Regulations for the Protection of Information Network Transmission and the Suggestion for Personal Information Protection Law take information rights protection as their value orientation. However, the Regulation of the People's Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information, Law of the People's Republic of China on Guarding State Secrets, Archives Law of the People's Republic of China, and the Drafts of Library Law of the People's Republic of China take information obligations as their value orientation. This paper proposes that we should establish an information law system that takes the information right protection as the central value orientation. 18 refs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229