中美在达尔富尔问题上的立场和政策--基于双方官方发言的解读  

Chinese and U.S. Positions and Policies on the Darfur Issue—An Interpretation of Their Official Statements

作　　者：顾国平[1] 董继荣 

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学英语学院美国研究中心2006级博士生,北京100089 [2]中国日报社高级编辑,北京100029

出　　处：《国际论坛》2010年第1期27-34,共8页International Forum

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中美官方语言的文化差异及其语言策略研究”成果之一,批准号:06BYY015

摘　　要：本文基于2004年7月到2008年7月四年间中美官方在达尔富尔问题上的主要发言和声明,从批判话语分析(CDA)的视角对双方话语所体现的各自的立场和政策及其背后的原因进行解读和分析。研究发现美方单方面认定达尔富尔地区发生了"种族灭绝",并对苏丹政府实施制裁,借此缓解国内政治压力,转移国际舆论的视线,并阻止别国利用苏丹的石油资源。与之相对,中方认为危机的根源在于当地的贫困和欠发达,主张各方通过对话和平等协商,消弭分歧,解决危机。与此相一致的是中方为危机的和平解决付出了巨大的外交努力,展示出了负责任的大国形象。Based on the major official statements by the United States and China concerning the Darfur crisis between July,2004,and July,2008,the article,attempts to interpret and analyze the two countries' positions and policies on the issue as well as the underlying reasons. The research finds the United States,in order to placate domestic pressure,shift the attention of the world public opinion and prevent the utilization of Sudanese oil resources by other countries,unilaterally claimed that the Sudanese government conducted 'genocide' in Darfur and therefore imposed sanctions. By contrast,China viewed the crisis as a result of local poverty and underdevelopment and proposed dialogue and consultation on an equal basis to solve the crisis peacefully.

关 键 词：美国 中国 达尔富尔 官方发言 

分 类 号：D81[政治法律—国际关系]