试论基金论文、综述性论文与学报影响力的辩证关系  

On Academic Values of Funded Articles and Summary Articles and Its Revelation to Academic Journals' Solicitation

作　　者：邢宝妹[1] 

机构地区：[1]江南大学杂志社,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2009年第6期139-142,共4页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：利用中国知网引文数据库,对国内26所"211院校"理科学报2002-2008年所载文献的载文量、下载频次、被引频次、基金论文被引频次等进行分析,结果表明:占基金论文比例最大的国家自然科学基金论文的篇均被引频次普遍低于总论文的篇均被引频次;在被引频次和下载频次前10篇的论文中,综述性论文所占比例远高于所载综述性论文与总论文的比例。指出学报在组稿时,应以学术质量为唯一标准,不应过份强调基金论文比例,同时吸收一些学科领域专家的特约综述,从而扩大影响力,满足读者的需求。An investigation and study,based on CNKI,on the published literature and funded articles on academic journals of science within China＇s 26 national key ＂211 Project＂ universities has been carried out. After quantity analysis of published literature,frequency analysis of being downloaded and cited as well as the funded articles,the result has shown：the per article＇s frequency of being cited of national nature and science funded articles which accounts for the largest proportion of all funded articles is usually lower than that of all articles; among the ten articles with the highest frequency of being cited and downloaded,summary articles account for a larger proportion of the ten articles than all articles. It pointed that based on the quality standard,less emphasis should be put on the proportion of funded articles in soliciting contributions,while take in invited summary of some experts in certain fields in order to enlarge influence force and meet readers＇ needs.

关 键 词：高校学报 组稿策略 被引频次 文献计量 

分 类 号：G232.1[文化科学]