论诉讼时效效力的启动模式及其影响  

The Mode and Influence of Limitation of Action's Effectiveness

作　　者：董士忠[1] 

机构地区：[1]安阳师范学院政法学院,河南安阳455002

出　　处：《安阳师范学院学报》2009年第6期17-21,共5页Journal of Anyang Normal University

摘　　要：我国民法关于诉讼时效效力采胜诉权消灭主义立法模式,但对时效届满后时效效力的启动模式规定不明确,以往司法实践中多采用法院主动适用时效规则的模式。从我国近代以来移植大陆法系法律制度的传统以及目前庭审改革吸纳当事人主义的趋势出发,采用抗辩权发生主义的时效效力启动模式,限定法院不得主动依职权适用诉讼时效规则,法官不得主动对当事人释明诉讼时效规则,是我国民法对诉讼时效效力启动模式在立法上的合理选择。The civil law of our country adopts the legislative mode of eliminating rule of the prevailing right on the time effectiveness , on which the starting mode is vaguely regulated after the expiration of the term of limitation , and formerly we mostly take the mode that the rule of prescription is applied to the court initiatively in the judical practice . Based on the tradition of the transplanted continential law systen in modem time and the tendency that the moment the court judge reform to absorb the litigants principle , it is the reasonable choice for our civil law to adopt the pattern of the demurrable right of prescription and limit the court that it has no right to apply the rule of time effectiveness of lawsuit initiatively , while it has no authority of office to explain the rule to the litigant personally

关 键 词：诉讼时效效力 胜诉权 时效抗辩权 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]