检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹建国[1]
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2010年第1期3-10,共8页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目"行政裁量基准制度研究"(项目号:08DFX020)的阶段性成果
摘 要:现代法治原则之下,为实现行政参与权利的充分、有效实现,最佳做法是为利害关系人参与行政过程营造一种"理想言谈情境"。"理想言谈情境"强调参与的平等性和参与后意见表达的自由性,由此,"理想言谈情境"下的行政参与应同时满足"在场性"和"参与实效"两项标准。前者可通过"听证"和"陈述及申辩"权的维护得以实现;后者的实现则有赖于"程序性权利"、行政公开、"禁止片面接触"原则的落实和相关配套制度的构建与完善。同时,还应对行政参与瑕疵采取"差序格局"式的司法审查及处理措施,以设定维护"理想言谈情境"的最后一道防线。Under the modern principle of rule of law, creating an ideal speech situation for stakeholders to participate in administrative process plays a key role in completely and effectively actualizing the right of participation. Both equal participation and the freedom of expression within the "ideal speech situation" are emphasized, thus, administrative participation under the situation should meet the standards of presence and practicality. Accordingly, protecting the right of hearing and the right of statement and that of representation serves to reach the former standards while construction and improvement of certain related systems such as procedural rights, administrative openness, and the principle of prohibition for one--sided contact attributes to reach the latter one. Meanwhile, in an effort to set up the last defense line for ideal speech situation, different patterns of judicial review and treatment measures should be adopted.
分 类 号:D035[政治法律—政治学] G642.41[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.11