检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢宁[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学新闻学院博士后流动站,上海200433
出 处:《福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第1期88-92,111,共6页Journal of Fuzhou University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:1873年上海道台致函英领事要求查禁《申报》,此事之始末多不见载于报史,盖由《申报》所论之官事触涉时讳,将矛头对准了上海及江浙地方官员所致。《申报》对官事的触及,可视为报纸试图与政府建立联系、扩大影响的一种努力,显示了作为商业报纸的《申报》政治性的一面。报人和官员对查禁一事的不同态度,彰显了对新闻纸这一新生事物理解上的巨大差异。在洋风推动下,报人的理念在进步。The fact of Shanghai circuit intendant's appeal to the British consulate for the ban of Shanghai Post in 1873 is generally not found in records of Shanghai newspapers history,the cause of which can be attributed to its carrying of articles of political taboos concerning local officials in Shanghai and Zhejiang.The involvement of Shanghai Post,a commercial newspaper in politics can be viewed as their efforts to establish relationship with the government and to extend the influence of the newspaper.The different attitudes of newspaper editors and government officials towards the ban of Shanghai Post indicate contrasting views on modern journalism.Influenced by western ideas,journalists' views on media begin to change.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38