CAFTA与WTO争端管辖权的竞合及选择  

The Overlapping of CAFTA and WTO Jurisdiction and China's Strategy

作　　者：曾文革[1] 吴雪燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《学术界》2010年第1期213-217,共5页Academics

摘　　要：《中国—东盟全面经济合作框架协议争端解决机制协议》建立了争端解决机制,解决中国—东盟自由贸易区(CAFTA)成员间的争端,然而CAFTA的成员除老挝外均为WTO成员,这就意味着WTO对CAFTA大部分成员间的争端也具有管辖权。WTO和CAFTA争端解决机制在争端解决的费用,当事方对争端的控制程度、适用法律,上诉、争端解决的时限、执行措施的力度等方面各有优缺点。中国在涉讼时应立足于其在中国东盟自由贸易区的定位,在考虑上述因素的同时,结合案件本身的特点和性质,决定诉讼场所。Agreement on Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the Framework Agreement came in to force and settled the dispute between the contracting parties of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area(CAFTA). But almost all of contracting parties of CAFTA are members of WTO, which means both CAFTA and WTO has jurisdiction over the disputes happened among most of the CAFTA members. The dispute settlement mechanisms of both WTO and CAFTA have advantages and disadvantages in respect of the cost, the control of the dispute parties over the dispute settlement process, the applicable law, the possibility of appeal, the time of dispute settlement and the enforcement of the award. When involved in a dispute, in deciding the forum, China should make decision according to its position in CAFTA While considering the above mentioned factors in combination with the character and nature of the dispute.

关 键 词：CAFTA WTO 诉讼场所 争端解决 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]