不同健康教育模式对糖尿病患者相关费用影响的效果分析  

Analysis about different type of health education on diabetes related costs

作　　者：鞠昌萍[1] 孙子林[1] 金晖[1] 刘莉莉[1] 闵捷[2] 韩晶[1] 陆青松[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学附属中大医院内分泌科,南京210009 [2]东南大学公共卫生学院

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志（中旬版）》2010年第1期11-13,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：江苏省卫生厅重大科研项目（K200608）

摘　　要：目的评价短期集中强化糖尿病健康教育加后续的网络化随访对糖尿病患者费用水平的影响。方法将83例糖尿病患者随机分为实验组41例和对照组42例分别采用短期集中强化糖尿病健康教育加后续网络化随访和传统的分次糖尿病健康教育的方式进行健康教育，在健康教育后3，6，12个月后分别评价2组患者的糖尿病相关费用水平。结果干预后1-3个月实验组糖尿病患者的保健品费用显著低于对照组，干预后4-6个月实验组糖尿病患者的检查费用显著高于对照组。结论短期集中强化的糖尿病健康教育短期内不改变糖尿病相关费用的月平均总额，改变费用构成比。Objective To know the influence of short-term hard health education combined with net- working fellow-up on diabetes related costs. Methods Divided 83 diabetes patients into the experimental group （41 cases） and the control group （42 cases） randomly. Short-term hard health education combined with networking fellow-up and traditional health education was used in the two groups respectively, and then evaluated the diabetes related costs between the two groups on the time points of the third, the sixth and the dozenth month. Results The costs of health products in the control group was significant higher than that of in the experimental group from the first month to the third month after the intervention, while the inspection expenses in the experimental group was significant higher than that of in the control group from the fourth month to the sixth month after the intervention. Conelusions Short-term hard health education can not change the average level of diabetes related costs, but it can change the constituent ratio of costs.

关 键 词：糖尿病 费用 健康教育 

分 类 号：R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R587.1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]