检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [2]黑龙江省建筑设计院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090
出 处:《中国矿业大学学报》2010年第1期20-25,共6页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(40571032);铁道部科技开发计划项目(2006G001-B-3)
摘 要:通过数值方法对多年冻土地区高压电塔热桩基础的稳定性进行了研究.分析了冻土活动层完全冻结和融化时,设计荷载作用下热桩基础的位移变化,并与普通桩基础进行了对比.计算结果表明:在春分日(活动层完全冻结)桩顶水平位移为0.02mm,竖向位移为0.13mm,秋分日(活动层完全融化)桩顶竖向位移为0.31mm,最大水平位移为5.16mm,均小于设计允许值.春、秋分日的热桩荷载位移控制比值的最大值分别为:0.82,0.02均小于1.0,表明水平荷载是杆塔基础设计的控制荷载.在相同荷载条件下春分日热桩桩顶水平位移为普通桩的8%,竖向位移为普通桩的62%,秋分日则分别为普通桩的7.9%和1.4%,可知在冻土地区热桩基础的稳定性明显高于普通桩基础.The displacement of thermosyphon and plain foundation-piles was calculated assuming design loading in a permafrost environment. The differences in pile design were compared for completely frozen or completely thawed permafrost. The thermosyphon pile had a horizontal displacement of 0.02 mm at the top and a vertical displacement of 0.13 mm when the layer was frozen (spring equinox). When the layers were thawed (autumnal equinox) the corresponding displacements were 5.16 mm and 0.31 mm. All these values are smaller than the allowed displacement. The maximum load-displacement control ratio is 0. 82 or 0. 02 for the spring or autumnal equinox. These values are both less than 1.0 so the horizontal load is adequate for design of a transmission-tower foundation. Under the same loading at spring equinox the maximum horizontal displacement of the thermosyphon design is 8 % of the plain pile foundation. Similarly, the maximum vertical displacement is 62%of the plain design. At autumnal equinox the corresponding displacements are 7.9 % and 1.4 %of the plain design. The thermosyphon pile foundation design is clearly more stable than a conventional pile foundation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222