明末奉教太监庞天寿考  

A Study on Achilleus Pang

作　　者：董少新[1] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学文史研究院,上海200433

出　　处：《复旦学报（社会科学版）》2010年第1期35-44,73,共11页Fudan Journal（Social Sciences）

基　　金：复旦大学"985工程"哲学社会科学创新基地文史研究院研究项目(EYH3801004);国家社科基金青年项目(KRH3801001);上海市浦江人才项目资助成果

摘　　要：庞天寿历任崇祯、弘光、隆武、永历四朝御马太监、司礼太监等职,因与马吉翔等谄事孙可望、威逼永历禅位,而为中国传统史家所不齿。天寿早年入天主教,曾奉敕往澳门招募葡兵抗清,并劝永历后宫多人领洗,在永历朝与天主教关系方面发挥了重要作用,故后世教会史家对天寿颇多赞誉,而不提其不忠事。对天寿忠君与信仰两问题,论者多因立场不同而对史料各采所需,造成对同一人物迥然不同的评价。本文在前人研究的基础上,进一步比勘中西文史料,重考此人,力求较为真实地复原庞天寿的历史形象;同时通过此一案例,略论史料、史家之预设立场与历史人物评价间的关系。The famous Eunuch Christian Aquileo Pang （Pang Tianshou, 1588-1657） served as the Directorate of the Imperial Horses and Ministry of Rites, etc. , in Chongzhen, Hongguang, Longwu and Yongli regimes of the Ming Dynasty. He was baptized by Jesuit Father Nicolo Longobardi around 1629. Most Chinese sources criticize him because he and Ma Jixiang compelled Emperor Yongli to abdicate and hand over the crown to Sun Kewang during 1652-1655 ; whereas all Western sources highly praise him, because he was important for Christian mission in the South Ming Regime. Based on both Chinese and Western sources, this article tries to give a complete image of Aquileo Pang. Also through this case, sources and standpoints of historians, and their relations with the evaluation of historical figures, are briefly discussed.

关 键 词：庞天寿 南明 天主教 中西文献 人物评价 

分 类 号：K248.3[历史地理—历史学]