机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院内分泌科,广州510080 [2]中山大学附属第三医院内分泌科 [3]贵阳医学院附属医院内分泌科 [4]南京大学鼓楼医院内分泌科 [5]中南大学湘雅二医院内分泌科 [6]中山大学附属第二医院内分泌科 [7]四川大学华西医院内分泌科 [8]广西医科大学第一附属医院内分泌科 [9]福建医科大学第一附属医院内分泌科
出 处:《中华内科杂志》2010年第1期9-13,共5页Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
基 金:基金项目:国家973计划(2006AA02A409);广东省自然基金重点项目(9251008901000030);卫生部2007-2009年度临床学科重点项目
摘 要:目的评价早期强化治疗对不同血糖水平新诊断2型糖尿病患者胰岛B细胞功能和预后的影响。方法382例新诊断2型糖尿病患者随机给予持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)、每日多次胰岛素注射(MDI)及口服降糖药(OHA)短期强化治疗,治疗前后测血糖、血脂及游离脂肪酸(FFA)、空腹胰岛素原与空腹胰岛素比值(PI/I),行静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT),评价胰岛素急性分泌时相(AIR),计算稳态模型β细胞功能指数(HOMA—β)和胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)。随访1年以上。根据入选时空腹血浆血糖(FPG)水平进行分层分析,A层:7.0mmoL/L≤FPG〈11.1mmol/L。B层:11.1mmol/L≤FPG≤16.7mmol/L。结果A层患者的治疗达标率更高(94.4%比89.8%),血糖达标时间更短,1年缓解率也更高(47.8%比35.7%,P〈0.05);而B层患者治疗后血糖、血脂的改善和FFA的下降更明显,且HOMA-β增加更多,但A、B层患者间AIR、PI/I比值和HOMA—IR改善程度差异无统计学意义。而无论A层或B层,胰岛素治疗(CSII、MDI)较OHA组有更高的1年缓解率(A层:57.1%,51.8%比32.8%,P〈0.05;B层:44.4%,38.7%比18.6%,P〈0.05)。结论短期胰岛素强化治疗较口服药治疗不仅使FPG较高的2型糖尿病患者具有更高的1年缓解率,在FPG轻中度增高的患者中获益也较大。Objective To investigate the effects of early intensive therapy on β cell function and long-term glyeemie control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with different recruiting fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. Methods A total of 382 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with FPG 7.0- 16.7 mmol/L were randomly assigned to therapy with insulin in the form of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injection (MDI) or oral hypoglyeemie agents (OHA, by using gliclazide and/or metformin ) for initial rapid correction of hyperglycemia. The treatments were stopped after euglycemia had been maintained for 2 weeks. The patients were followed longitudinally on diet alone for 1 year. Intravenous glucose tolerances tests (IVGITs) were performed and blood glucose, insulin and proinsulin were measured before and after therapy as well as at 1-year follow-up. Homeostasis model assessment(HOMA) of β cell function and insulin resistance index (HOMA-β and HOMA-IR)werecalculated. All the patients were stratified on the recruiting FPG: stratum A (7.0 mmol/L ≤ FPG 〈 11.1 mmol/L), stratum B ( 11.1 mmol/L ≤ FPG ≤ 16. 7 mmol/L ). Results More patients in stratum A achieved target glycemic control (94.4% vs 89.8% ) and in shorter time [ (5.9 ±3.8)d vs(6.9 ±3.6)d, P 〈 0. 051 as compared with those in stratum B. J5 cell function represented by HOMA-β and acute insulin response (AIR) improved significantly after intensive interventions in both stratum A and B patients. However, the remission rate at 1 year was significantly higher in stratum A patients (47.8%) than those in stratmn B (35.7%, P 〈 0.05 ). The patients treated with insulin (especially with CSII ) had higher remission rates and better improvement of AIR at 1 year follow-up irrespective of the recruiting FPG ( CSII or MDI vs OHA: 57.1%, 51.8% vs 32. 8% in stratum A, P 〈0. 05 ; 44.4%, 38.7% vs 18.6% in stratum B, P 〈0.05). Conclusions Compared with O
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...