文坛究竟座落在何处——论文协同人对“与抗战无关论”的批判  

Where Does the Literary Arena Repose?——On the Chinese Association Colleague's Criticism of Being the View of "Unrelated to the War against Japanese"

作　　者：段从学[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学文学院,成都610068

出　　处：《晋阳学刊》2010年第1期103-109,共7页Academic Journal of Jinyang

基　　金：国家社科基金青年资助项目"文协与抗战时期的文艺运动"前期研究成果;批准号:08CZW033

摘　　要：对梁实秋"与抗战无关论"的批判,是文协同人为了确立文协在文坛上的领导地位,坚持抗战文艺的基本方向而发动的,因此论争虽然围绕着抗战文艺的题材和艺术质量问题展开,但双方在这两个问题上的观点其实并无差别。因论争的目的不在于探讨理论问题,因此从自由主义文艺思潮和左翼文艺思潮之间的冲突这个角度来探讨这场论争并不合适,除了争夺文坛领导地位这个先在的目的之外,非此即彼的二元论思维模式,以及论争双方各自理解的"真实"之差异,才是导致这场论争的根源。The criticism of Liang Shiqiu＇s view about being ＂Unrelated to the War Against Japanese＂ resulted from the aim of the colleague in Chinese Writers Association to establish their leadership in literary arena and persist in the principles of literature and art against Japanese imperialism. There was no difference in the viewpoints of both sides in the debates. The dualism of ＂either this or that＂ and the differences in the understandings of ＂reality＂, besides the preexistent aim to contest for the leadership in literary arena＇ resulted in their confrontation.

关 键 词：梁实秋 “与抗战无关论” 文协 抗战文艺 孔罗荪 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]