检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,杨凌712100
出 处:《干旱区资源与环境》2010年第2期12-16,共5页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
摘 要:根据陕西省以及11地市(区)1997-2006年耕地变化和社会经济数据,采用主成分分析法探讨陕西省各地市(区)耕地面积变化的驱动力及其差异。结果表明:陕西省省域耕地面积变化第一驱动力为社会经济因素,第二驱动力为退耕还林政策;根据驱动因子内容划分,咸阳、宝鸡、渭南、榆林、商洛属于产业拉动型,铜川和延安属于投资推动型;西安、汉中和安康属于社会经济综合驱动型;10个地级市均受到退耕还林政策的驱动,杨凌示范区则由于特定的发展时期受到固定资产投资的驱动影响。陕西省11地市(区)耕地变化的第一驱动力存在区域上的差异,第二驱动力差异较小。Based on the statistics of the cultivated land areas of Shaanxi and its 11 districts the driving forces and regional differences of cultivated land area changes were studied by the method of principal components analysis. The outcomes indicated that socioeconomic factor was the first driving force for cultivated land change, while reforestation of the cultivated land was the second. According to the loading indexes of component, the driving force of cultivated land variation of Xianyang, Baoji, Weinan, Yulin and Shangluo were influenced by industries, and that of Tongchuan and Yanan by investment. Cultivated land area changes of Xian, Hanzhong and Ankang were driven by socioeconomic factor. Reforestation of the cultivated land was the second driving force in the ten of the districts, and else asset investment had an impact on Yangling. The first driving force of the cultivated land area variation existed regional difference, while the second one was closer among districts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28