检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心,山东济南250012
出 处:《中国病原生物学杂志》2010年第1期40-41,53,共3页Journal of Pathogen Biology
基 金:"十一五"科技支撑计划重大项目(No.2007BAI07A01)
摘 要:目的评价阿苯达唑乳剂在治疗包虫病方面的效果。方法根据Cochrane Handbook质量评价标准评价纳入文献的质量,并对纳入文献的研究结果进行对照分析。结果在治愈效果方面,阿苯达唑乳剂相对片剂要好;阿苯达唑乳剂治愈率和有效率接近外科手术。结论从循证学角度,纳入文献存在质量等级低、样本量较少等缺陷,证明阿苯达唑乳剂的临床效果评价需要更多高质量文献的支持。Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an albendazole emulsion in treating echinococcosis. Methods Cochrane Handbook items were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The outcomes noted in articles were compared. Results An albendazole emulsion more therapeutic than albendazole tablets and simpler than surgery. Conclusion In accordance with principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), the reviewed sources had defects such as low quality and small sample size, so more articles of better quality are needed to prove the effectiveness of an albendazole emulsion in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.26.35