检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡海兵[1] 程桦[1] 姚直书[1] 荣传新[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽理工大学土木建筑学院,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《煤矿安全》2010年第1期16-19,共4页Safety in Coal Mines
摘 要:为了揭示双卸压槽修复破裂井壁的机理,采用对比方法,通过设置双卸压槽的井壁试件与未设卸压槽的普通井壁试件的模型试验,对此问题进行了研究。研究结果表明:对于设置双卸压槽的井壁,双卸压槽的压缩变形可有效地衰减井壁附加力,确保井壁安全;对于未设卸压槽的井壁,井壁竖向变形很小,极易破坏。For opening out the mechanism of repairing broken shaft lining by double pressure -release toughs method, in the thesis shaft lining in which is installed double pressure - release toughs and general shaft lining in which is not installed pressure - release toughs are experimental researched. Research result show that, for shaft lining which is installed double pressure - release toughs, compression deformation of pressure - release toughs can effectively attenuate subsidiary load of shaft lining, and shaft lining is safe. However, for general shaft lining in which is not installed pressure - release toughs, it has less vertical deformation, and it can be easi- ly damaged
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249