检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国葛洲坝集团第二工程有限公司国际分公司,北京100037 [2]三峡大学土木水电学院,湖北宜昌443002 [3]宜昌市水利水电勘察设计院,湖北宜昌443002
出 处:《水利科技与经济》2010年第2期136-139,共4页Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy
摘 要:分析了我国病险土石坝渗漏的原因,提出了土石坝渗漏问题的处理原则及其各类防渗处理措施,建议在病险土石坝防渗加固方案比选时,应在可靠性、可行性等安全分析的同时,进行经济对比和施工工效分析。通过优化比选,提出最优的加固模式和加固工法,并结合工程实例,阐述对于一个具体的病险水库大坝,应根据其病害的具体情况,对多种防渗加固方案进行技术、经济和施工可行性的比较,选择技术可靠、经济合理、施工简便的防渗技术方案。The cause of seepage of dangerous earth - rock dam is investigated. The treatment principle and various types of anti - seepage measures are presented. The reliability and feasibility are safety analyzed simultaneously economic contrast and construction efficiency should be analyzed in selecting anti - seepage reinforcement program. By optimizing the selection, the best reinforcement pattern and reinforcement method are presented. Combined with engineering project, the technique, economy and construction feasibility of comparison is done for various types of anti - seepage reinforcement projects according to the specific conditions of disease to select the technical reliability, economic rationality, construction simple of anti - seepage technical solutions in the specific dangerous earth rock dam.
分 类 号:TV641[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40