检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴曙霞[1] 吴东[1] 张桂云[2] 李培进[1]
机构地区:[1]军事医学科学院卫生勤务与医学情报研究所,北京100850 [2]中国人民解放军总医院,北京100853
出 处:《中华医学图书情报杂志》2010年第1期53-55,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
摘 要:目的:为了解不同查新机构的查新报告质量的差异和影响因素,以及存在的问题,总结科技查新的经验,提炼科技查新质量管理的研究方法。方法:由22家查新机构统一完成同一查新项目,采用查新、科研管理与相关领域专家判读的方法,对所完成的22份查新报告的质量要素和相关影响因素进行分析。结果:发现不同查新机构出具的查新报告中的各要素如资源选择、检索策略、结果列举、查新结论等均存在较大差异。结论:应提高科技查新咨询业务水平及其标准化程度。Aim:To investigate the different levels of reports on literature evaluation for the application of scientific and technical projects or achievements in different corresponding organizations, its influence factors and problems, to summarize its experience and to find the methods for its quality control. Methods:After the corresponding 22 organizations completed the same literature evaluation, the quality of the 22 reports and its related influence factors were analyzed by experts in literature evaluation, scientific research management and related fields. Results : Large differences were found in the factors influencing the quality of reports completed by the corresponding organizations, such as selection of resources, retrieval strategies, numerated results, and conclusion. Conclusion: The level of literature evaluation for the application of scientific and technical projects or achievements and its standardization should be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222