环境管制与中国区域生产率增长  

Environmental Regulation and Regional TFP Growth of China

作　　者：吴军[1] 笪凤媛[1] 张建华[2,3,4] 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学经济学院 [2]华中科技大学产业经济研究所 [3]985国家哲学社会科学创新基地"科技发展与人文精神"研究中心 [4]华中科技大学经济发展研究中心

出　　处：《统计研究》2010年第1期83-89,共7页Statistical Research

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“基于新型工业化道路的工业结构优化升级研究”(06&ZD035);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助项目“中国经济的转型发展与长期增长战略研究”(NCET-05-0655)资助

摘　　要：本文将环境因素纳入TFP测算框架,测算并比较分析了2000年以来我国三大区域在是否考虑环境因素两种情形下的TFP、生产效率与技术进步指数。结果发现:在控制SO2和COD排放时全国TFP增长率不到传统TFP增长率的1/3,并且TFP增长均完全源于前沿技术进步。环境管制下TFP增长由高到低依次为西、东、中部,而在未考虑环境因素时为东、中、西部。样本期间西部地区环境技术进步率一直快于传统技术进步率;东部地区则正好相反,但其在两种情形下皆为引领技术革新的主要区域;中部地区2001-2005年环境技术进步率快于传统技术进步率,但2005年后出现逆转。Considering the environmental factors, this article measures and compares two kinds of China＇s regional TFP,technology change and technique efficiency indexes. The major conclusions are as follows：China＇ s green TFP growth rate is less than 1/3 of that in the traditional condition,and both mainly result from technical progress;The western region has the highest green TFP growth ,while the eastern region has the highest traditional TFP growth. The environmental technological progress of the central region was faster than its traditional technological progress before 2005 ,which has been reversed since 2006. The environmental technological progress of the western region has been faster than the traditional technological progress, while the eastern region is quite the opposite ,which is the main region who leaded technological innovation in both cases.

关 键 词：全要素生产率 环境管制 Malmquist—Luenberger指数 

分 类 号：C812[社会学—统计学]