检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔爱香[1] 曹磊[1] 江冶[1] 赵斌[1] 汤志云[1]
出 处:《岩矿测试》2010年第1期29-33,共5页Rock and Mineral Analysis
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(40871155)
摘 要:采用干法灰化和微波消解两种样品分解方法处理植物试样,用电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定样品中铝、钡、钙、铜、钾、镁、钠、铁等22个主、次量元素的含量,用两种前处理方法对国家一级标准物质进行测定,比对测定值与标准值,验证两种方法的准确度和精密度。结果表明,不同的样品分解方法对各元素的测定结果会产生不同程度的影响。选择适宜的分解方法可以大大提高植物样品中铝、铁、硫等元素测定结果的准确度。干法灰化和微波消解两种前处理方法的精密度(RSD,n=11)均小于5%。Plant samples were decomposed by two different methods of microwave digestion and dry ashing 22 elements such as AI, Ba, Ca, Cu, K, Mg, Na, Fe, etc were determined by inductively coupled plasma- atomic emission spectrometry. National standard reference materials were also measured along with the plant samples to test the accuracy and precision of the two methods. The experimental results indicated that different decomposition methods influenced measurement results in various degrees and adequate selection of decomposition methods can improve the accuracy of measurement results of Al, Fe, S, etc in plant samples. The precision of two methods was better than 5 % RSD ( n = 11 ).
关 键 词:电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法 干法灰化 微波消解 植物样品 主次量元素
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222