检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:逯建华[1] 吴永胜[1] 武南[1] 吴小敏[1]
出 处:《中国公共卫生管理》2010年第1期2-4,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health Management
摘 要:目的了解深圳市区级疾控中心的业务发展现状及趋势,为科学衔接国家绩效评估指标提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析深圳市六区疾控中心2004~2008年的年度业务考核指标权重及平均得分率。结果六区疾控中心2004~2008年度业务考核平均得分率由2004年的89.4%上升至2008年的95.3%,整体呈上升趋势。"疾病预防与控制"项目的权重由0.35上升至0.39,"实验室建设与管理"项目的权重由0.18上升至0.25,而"健康危害因素监测"项目的权重则逐年减少,由0.35下降至0.24,"信息管理"、"科研培训"和"健康教育"的权重变化不大,且保持较高的平均得分率。结论随着疾控系统的改革发展,深圳市区级疾控中心的"疾病预防与控制"及"实验室建设与管理"能力建设得到明显加强,而"健康危害因素监测"中的创收职能则逐步削弱。Objective To understand the development status and trends of CDC of district-level of Shenzhen, and provide the reference for national assessing performance. Methods Retrospective analytical methods was adopted for annual assessment indicators and their average evaluation scores in the six district-level CDC's in Shenzhen from 2004 to 2008. Results 'llae average scores in six district-level CDCs' rose from 89,4% in 2004 to 95.3% in 2008. The weighting of disease control programs incensed from 0.35 to 0.39, and the weighting of laboratory programs increased from O. 18 to 0.25, but the weighting of health risk factors surveillance programs decreased from 0.35 to 0.24. The weighting of information management, researching and training, and health education did not change so much, and continued to ~Ilect a high scoring rate. Conclusion The disease control and laboratory functions of district-level CDC were significantly strengthened, while generate profit functions in the health risk factors surveillance pro- grams gradually weakened.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31