检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李玉兰[1] 黄振宇[1] 肖丽红[1] 梁晓[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第五附属医院内分泌科,545006
出 处:《中国糖尿病杂志》2010年第1期12-14,共3页Chinese Journal of Diabetes
基 金:广西卫生厅科研项目(Z2007299);广西柳州市科技局科学研究与计划开发项目(20040236)
摘 要:目的探讨强化治疗与常规治疗对初诊T2DM患者胰岛β细胞功能和胰岛素抵抗(IR)的影响。方法初诊T2DM患者选用非胰岛素促泌药物治疗后,HbA_1c≤6.5%者53例,>6.5%者58例,对OGTT血糖、Ins、HOMA-β、HOMA-IR进行组间比较。结果与常规组比较,达标组OGTT的5个时点血糖均显著降低(P均<0.01);180min Ins明显降低(P<0.05),其他时点Ins也降低,但无统计学差异(P>0.05);HOMA-IR明显降低,HOMA-β明显升高(P均<0.05);葡萄糖处置指数显著升高(P<0.01);△I_(30)/△G_(30)和AUC_(Ins)组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论初诊T2DM患者早期血糖强化达标治疗比常规治疗更能有效改善高血糖状态,减轻IR程度,提高β细胞基础分泌功能。Objective To compare islet β-cell function and IR in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus between glucose-in-target-level therapy and routine therapy. Methods Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients were treated for 12 months with insulin or metformin or acarbose or pioglitazone. Two groups with HbA1c≤6.5% (n= 53) and 〉6. 5% (n= 58) were divided. Levels of OGTT-glucose, insulin and indexes of β-cell function were compared between two groups. Results In glucose-in-targetlevel versus routine therapy group: (1)levels of blood glucose in OGTT were significantly decreased(P〈0. 01). (2)levels of insulin were not markedly different(P〉0. 05) except 180 min(P〈0. 05). (3)HOMA-IR was significantly decreased (P 〈 0. 05) ; HOMA-β and DI were significantly increased ( P 〈 0. 01 and P 〈 0. 05). However, △I30/△G30 and AUCins were not markedly different(P〉0. 05 )between two groups. Condusions Early glucose-in-target-level therapy versus routine therapy could decrease hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, increase insulin secretion at baseline in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28