论不作为侵权及其法律完善  

On the Tort by Omission and Its Legislative Perfection

作　　者：赵万一[1] 蒋英燕[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院 [2]上海大学

出　　处：《北方法学》2010年第1期36-45,共10页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：不作为侵权是与作为侵权相对应的一种侵权形式。与作为侵权相比,不作为侵权不但有其独特的价值目标和理论基础,而且有其特殊的构成要件和责任规制要求。不作为侵权与一般性民事救助义务密切相联,其司法适用除依赖明确的法律刚性规定之外,还受制于公序良俗、习惯、诚实信用原则等软性因素的影响。在我国未来的侵权责任法立法中,应在广泛借鉴外国先进立法理念和成熟制度的基础上,结合中国的国情积极引入这一制度。在立法技术上可采取概括加列举的方式对这一制度的适用进行必要限制。In respect of the form of tort liability, the tort by omission is the counterpart of the tort by act, and compared with the latter, the former not only has its own particular values and theoretical grounds, but also has its own constitutive requirements and liability requirements. The tort by omission is closely related to general civil salvage obligation. As regulated by specific entrenched clauses, its juristic application is also subject to jus publice stabilitum, costum, bona fide doctrine, etc. The tort by omission should be introduced in the future legislation on tort liability, by taking reference of the advanced legal thoughts and mature systems of other countries. In legislative strategies, generalization and enumeration should be combined to the application of this system.

关 键 词：侵权行为 不作为侵权 一般性救助义务 立法完善 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学] D924[政治法律—法学]