论犯罪事实的性质  

On the Nature of Facts of Crime

作　　者：于逸生[1] 董玉庭[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2010年第1期65-76,共12页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：在刑事诉讼过程中,司法机关最终确认的犯罪事实是一种什么性质的事实,主要存在着客观真实说与法律真实说的竞争。客观真实说与法律真实说的对抗并非两种刑事诉讼证明标准之间的对抗,而是对刑事司法程序中确认的认识论犯罪事实的两种不同定性。法律真实说之所以更为恰当,是因为法律真实说尊重现实,可以为认识论犯罪事实的可谬性找到逻辑上的根据,有利于程序优先司法理念的确定,并且符合司法特质。In criminal litigation procedures, facts of crime are finally ascertained by the judicial department but with such controversy over the nature of facts as the doctrine of the objective truth or the legal truth. They are not confrontation between two testament criteria but between two cognitive classifications. The doetrine of legal truth prevails because from cognitive perspective it respects facts and offers logic background for fallacy of facts, which will better establish the judicial idea of the procedures preference and in compliance the judicial nature.

关 键 词：客观真实说 法律真实说 认识论犯罪事实 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学] D915.13[政治法律—法学]