检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医药指南》2010年第5期8-10,共3页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨多普勒超声引导痔动脉结扎治疗痔的临床疗效。方法将130例纳入病例按住院先后顺序随机分为对照组和观察组各65例。对照组采用外剥内扎术进行治疗;观察组采用DG-HAL术进行治疗。术后评估疗效。结果两组患者临床疗效比较,观察组总有效率(83.1%)明显优于对照组(64.6%),具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论DG-HAL术治疗痔具有微创、安全,操作简单及术后恢复快等优势,值得临床推广使用。Objective To discusses the clinical curative effect about Doppler supersonic guidance hemorrhoids artery ligation treatment hemorrhoids. Methods Integrates the case 130 examples to divide into the control group and observation group each 65 examples stochastically successively according to in hospital order. Outside the control group uses exhausted in grips the technique to carry on the treatment; The observation group uses the DG-HAL technique to carry on the treatment. After the technique, appraises the curative effect. Results Two group of patient clinical curative effect comparison, observation group total effectiveness (83.1%) surpasses the control group obviously (64.6%), has statistics significance (P〈0.05). Conclusions The DG-HAL technique treatment hemorrhoids have micro create, safely, after simplicity of operator and technique, restores and so on superiority quiekly, is worth the clinical promoted use.
关 键 词:痔 多普勒超声引导痔动脉结扎术 Milligan—Morgan术 疗效比较
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38