检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周石峰[1]
机构地区:[1]贵州师范大学历史与政治学院,贵州贵阳55001
出 处:《贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第1期32-37,共6页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目<抵制日货运动的历史困境(1908-1945)>(08XZS012)的阶段成果
摘 要:1923年的抵制日货运动既未实现收回旅顺和大连的政治目标,亦未动摇日本经济基础。国人采用区别对待日本政府与民众的运动策略,而日本朝野上下的强硬立场并无不同。在中日双方国力悬殊的非均衡博弈中,日方的政治压力最终成为抵货运动难以持续进行的外部性制约因素。没有强大国力作为坚强后盾而仅凭消极的经济抵制,民族主义目标绝难一蹴而就。The boycott of Japanese goods did not achieve the political goal of regaining Lvshun and Dalian, and did not shake Japanese economic base in 1923. Chinese people devised different tactics to Japan government and Japanese. However, Japanese from coast to coast has the unyielding similarly standpoint to Chinese. Because of the greatly disequilibrium between China and Japan in national strength, the political pressure from Japan finally became the external and significant factor that made the boy- cott movement be hard to progress continuously. Our political target would be hard to come true, if we just rely on the passive economic boycott but no strong national strength.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222