两种不同消毒方法对静脉抽血患者消毒效果的影响  

Effect of two different sterilization methods on disinfection for blood drawing

作　　者：赵丽艳[1] 邵培双[1] 任桂芝[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第五医院妇产科,黑龙江大庆163316

出　　处：《现代临床护理》2010年第1期53-54,共2页Modern Clinical Nursing

摘　　要：目的比较两种不同消毒方法对静脉采血患者消毒效果的影响。方法将480例受试患者随机分为观察组(丹尼尔组)和对照组(碘伏组),每组各240例。观察组患者静脉穿刺前使用丹尼尔喷雾消毒,对照组患者常规应用0.5%碘伏棉签擦拭消毒,观察两组患者的消毒效果。结果两组患者皮肤消毒的细菌杀灭率均﹥96.0%、消毒合格率均为100.0%,两组比较,均P>0.05,差异无统计学意义;对照组、观察组患者1次消毒操作时间分别为(35.28±1.14)s、(6.46±0.39)s,两组比较,均P﹤0.01,差异具有统计学意义,观察组消毒操作所需时间短。结论丹尼尔消毒液的消毒效果确切,操作简便、有效节省操作时间,提高了护理人员的工作效率,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the effect of two different sterilization methods on disinfection of venipuncture. Methods A total of 480 patients were divided into the observation group （Darmir group） and the control group （lodophor group）, with 240 cases in each group. The observation group was disinfected with Dannir disinfectant spray, while the control group was disinfected with iodophor. Results The bacteria killing rates of two methods were over 96.0%, the qualifying rates were 100.0%, and there was no significant difference between thfi two groups （all P 〉 0.05）. The time of disinfection of two groups was significantly different, which were（35.28 ＋ 1.14）s in the control group and （6.46 ~ 0.39）s in the observation group（all P 〈 0.01）. Conclusions Darmir skin disinfectant spray has credible disinfection efficacy, and it is easy to operate and saves the operating time. It can improve the efficiency of nursing staff, and deserves spreading in clinical practices.

关 键 词：丹尼尔 皮肤消毒液 喷雾消毒 

分 类 号：R187[医药卫生—流行病学]