检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马德才[1,2]
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学法学院国际法研究所 [2]武汉大学国际法研究所
出 处:《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第1期27-32,共6页Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
摘 要:公共秩序虽因其实质在于维护本国国家及其人民的利益而被称为国际私法中的"安全阀",但由于它缺乏一个确定、统一的概念与适用标准,因而该制度在实践中容易被滥用。而公共秩序的滥用势必大大降低国际私法在协调各国法律冲突中的价值,妨碍国际民事交往的稳定和安全,有悖于当今世界政治、经济一体化的大趋势,甚至走向国际私法价值取向的反面。正因为如此,所以有必要对公共秩序加以限制适用,且业已成为公共秩序的发展趋势之一。我国有关立法也应顺应这一发展趋势加以完善。Although the public order is known as the "safety valve" of private international law owing to its safeguarding the interests of the home nation and its people in essence, it is to be abused easily in practice because of its lack of a firm, unified concepts and applicable standards. The abuse of public order is bound to greatly reduce the value of private international law in the course of coordination of conflict of laws and hinder the stability and security of the international civil exchanges, and is contrary to today's general trend of political and economic integration, and even be the opposite coin of the values trend of private international law. That is why it is necessary to limit the application of public order, and it is one of the development trends of public order. The relevant legislations should conform to this development trend and to be improved accordingly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28