检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘艳玲[1] 杨绮莉[1] 王耀兰[1] 黎穗[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2010年第2期36-38,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的比较3M公司生产的2种爱护佳手消毒液在外科手消毒中的应用效果。方法将参加手术的医护人员随机分为实验组121例和对照组116例。实验组的手消毒采用揉搓法,手消毒液为9200+9230。对照组的手消毒采用刷手法,消毒液为9241.D+9250。比较2组手消毒效果。结果2组手消毒效果比较无显著差异,但揉搓法更加人性化,操作者的依从性更高。结论在外科手消毒时建议使用9200+9230手消毒液揉搓消毒的方法。Objective To know the application effects of two different hand prepping by avagard before the operation. Methods Divided operation-actors into the experimental group (121 cases) and the control group (116 cases)randomly. Kneading hand prepping by 9200 and 9230 avagard was used in the experimental group, while the brushing by 9241-D and 9250 was used in the control group. Compared the effects between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference about disinfection effects between the two groups, while the compliance of kneading hand prepping was more better than the other hand prepping method. Conclusions Kneading hand prepping by avagard 9200 should be used before surgical operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229