论侵权责任法规定行政侵权责任的必要性  

The Need for Administrative Tort Liability in Tort Liability Act

作　　者：白丽云[1] 谭恩惠[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]山西省政法管理干部学院法律系,副教授太原030012 [2]华中科技大学 [3]太原科技大学,法学教授太原030012

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2010年第2期37-39,共3页Chinese Public Administration

摘　　要：行政侵权与一般民事侵权是两种不同的侵权,行政侵权责任是在公法领域中发生的私法责任。法院在审判实践中处理行政侵权案件时,应当优先适用国家赔偿法的有关规定;国家赔偿法无规定时则适用一般法,也就是适用侵权责任法的规定。民事法律规范在行政赔偿问题上的继续适用有内在的合理性;侵权责任法草案对行政侵权责任做出原则性的规定,符合我国的立法传统。因此,将来的侵权责任法规定行政侵权责任是必要的,也是可行的。Administrative infringement and tort are two different types of infringement. Administrative Tort Liability belongs to the private responsibility in the field of public law. Dealing with administrative violations, Court should give priority to State Compensation Law, and then consider the application of general law. Civil laws being applied in the executive compensation issues have inherent reasonableness. If the Tort Liability Draft formulates the principles for administrative infringement liability, it will be in line with the tradition of our country. So, in the future, it is necessary and feasible for Tort Liability Act to regulate the administrative tort liability.

关 键 词：行政侵权责任 侵权责任法 立法建议 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]