检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学,天津300387 [2]天津理工大学法政学院,天津300191
出 处:《中国行政管理》2010年第2期40-44,共5页Chinese Public Administration
摘 要:经济执法的级别管辖问题既是经济法的实施问题,也是行政执法的程序问题,与中央政府和地方政府的事权划分问题直接相关。目前中国的经济执法以地方政府为主,其实施中遇到的最大问题是地方保护主义,要克服这一顽症,需要将经济执法的重心上移到比较高层级的政府——直至中央政府。这不仅与经济法管理事务的受益范围——属于全国性和跨省的事务相符合,也符合建立权力和责任高度统一的中央政府和地方政府的需要。The grade jurisdiction of economic law enforcement is not only the issue of implementation of economic laws but also the issue of procedures of administrative law enforcement, which is directly related to the division of powers and responsibilities between central and local governments. At present, the local governments play the main role in economic law enforcement; while the biggest issue in the implementation of Chinese economic law enforcement is the local protectionism. To overcome that difficult problem, it needs us to move the focus of economic law enforcement up to a higher level government, and ultimately, to the central government. That not only conforms to the national and transprovincial nature of the economic law enforcement, but also meets the need of establishing a highly unified power and responsibility system between central and local governments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28