行政听证的政治逻辑架构——基于商谈理论的视角  

The Political Logic Framework of Public Administrative Hearing——In the View of Discourse Theory

作　　者：岳成浩[1,2] 薛冰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学公共管理学院 [2]南京大学政府管理学院

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2010年第2期105-109,共5页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：国家社会科学基金"行政听证制度的建制化研究:地方政府决策的公共性保障"(项目编号:09BZZ031);陕西省教育厅2009年度人文社科专项基金"西部政府决策的公共性保障与行政听证制度建制化研究"(项目编号:09JK231)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：听证制度的本意在于规训和导控行政权力,它可以基于三权分立与制衡的逻辑,也可以运用哈贝马斯的商谈理论来建构。商谈理论强调,行政权力应由源于日常交往所产生的交往权力导控,交往则是基于"理由"的商谈网络的形成与论辩的互动。针对面临和处理的不同问题,商谈又呈现为三个层次,即实用性商谈、伦理-政治性商谈和道德性商谈。本文认为,遵循商谈理论的逻辑,行政听证可分为以实用性商谈为主的行政项目类听证和以伦理-政治商谈为主的行政规划类听证、以道德商谈为主的行政法规类听证。The intention of public hearing is to regulate and direct administrative power, which could base on the logic of separation of power and check - and - balance, or on the theory of discourse which proposes administrative power should be channeled by communicative power in ordinary communication in life, but communication roots in the reasons of discourse network and interaction in arguing. People can communicate with each other equally, and form consensus in the process of communication and argument as a value for directing policy making by eliminating the influence of power and money. Because of different kinds of problems, the discourse appears three levels as pragmatic discourse, ethical and political discourse, and moral discourse. Basing on that logical theory, we could classify public administrative hearing into three types of public administrative hearing about projects, programming and laws.

关 键 词：行政听证 交往权力 商谈类型 

分 类 号：D035[政治法律—政治学]