检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学护理学院,210029 [2]江苏省省级机关医院糖尿病防治中心
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志(中旬版)》2010年第2期65-67,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的评价中文版行走受损问卷(WIQ)在2型糖尿病患者行走能力评估中的信效度。方法纳入2型糖尿病患者126例,以中文版WIQ问卷、简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)及6min步行试验(6MwT)为研究工具行资料收集,用信度分析、相关分析、两样本t检验等统计方法评价量表信效度。结果WIQ量表总的Cronbach’sα系数为0.867;WIQ量表的距离、速度、爬梯维度评分及总评分与6min行走距离(6MWD)相关;WIQ总评分与SF-36测量相同概念反映躯体健康的4个维度评分相关;不同年龄组问WIQ各维度及总评分比较差异显著。结论中文版WIQ问卷信效度较好,简单、可靠、实用,可用于评估2型糖尿病患者的行走能力。Objective To evaluate the raliability and validity of walking impairment questionnaire applied to assess the walking ability of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods One hundred and twentysix patients with type 2 diabetes were selected. WIQ, SF-36 and 6-minute walk test were used to collect data that was conducted for reliability analysis, correlation analysis and independent-samples t test to evaluate the reliability and validity. Results The internal consistency determined by Cronbach's α was 0.867 for the total WIQ score. Signifienat correlations were found between WIQ and 6MWD, also between WIQ and physical domains of SF-36. compared with patients over seventy-one years old, the score of WIQ including the distance, speed, stair climbing and total score is significantly higher than that in patients aged seventy- one or less than seventy-one years old. Conclusions The Chinese version of WIQ is a simple, valid and reliable, clinically relevant tool to assess the walking ability of patients with type 2 diabetes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28