检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:亓昕[1,2]
机构地区:[1]清华大学社会学系 [2]首都经济贸易大学
出 处:《人口研究》2010年第1期75-85,共11页Population Research
摘 要:农民的养老方式选择与他们实际具备的可行能力密不可分。这种可行能力取决于农村的经济状况、农民的生产方式、生活方式和制度环境。本文通过对我国目前农民生存状况的描述,通过农民对自己经历、体验讲述的分析,表明他们在处理参保问题上的行为逻辑与他人贴上的"理性小农"的标签完全不同。土地养老、子女养老并不是农民自愿选择的养老方式,而是迫不得已应对的结果。可行能力的缺乏使农民只能牺牲自己的长远利益而维持目前的生活状态。尽管对于农民不办理养老保险有各种各样的解释,但本文认为从可行能力解释农民的养老选择是一个不可忽视的视角。可行能力不仅包含着个人的能力而且与他们所处的社会位置密切有关。本文认为,国家长期以来的发展政策和社会政策与它的标的群体-农民之间的过大差距,最终形成了农村养老保政策运行低效及对农民养老选择的负面影响。Choices of peasant aging support are related to their capabilities, which are determined by rural economic conditions, production manners and institutional arrangements. Based on description of the living conditions of peasants and the narrative of their experiences, this study shows that they are neither traditional nor rational peasants regarding their participation in social insurance. Despite various explanations in not participating in social insurance, lack of capabilities is the major reason why peasants have no aging insurance. That they have to rely on land and children for their aging support is not their voluntary choice. Incapability leads to the fact that they sacrifice their long-term benefit but maintain the present living status. The rift is too large between peasants and state economic development strategies and social polices, affecting negatively rural aging support policy and choice of ageing support for peasants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.24