检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵红岩[1] 孙莹璞[1] 苏迎春[1] 郭艺红[1] 张轶乐[1] 孔慧娟[1] 李刚[1] 董悦芝[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心,郑州450052
出 处:《生殖与避孕》2010年第1期32-36,共5页Reproduction and Contraception
摘 要:目的:比较短效达必佳2种降调节方案在控制性超排卵(COH)中的效果。方法:回顾性分析比较本中心接受COH降调节方案的261个周期,根据达必佳用量及用法的不同分成A组:部分半量方案,95个周期;B组:半量方案,166个周期,比较组间的超促排卵情况及妊娠结局。结果:A组Gn用量(75IU/支)、Gn总天数、IVF受精率和优质胚胎率均较B组高(P<0.05);Gn启动日FSH水平和hCG注射日LH水平较B组低(P<0.05);着床率、临床妊娠率、继续妊娠率A组与B组比差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),但有增高趋势。结论:黄体中期短效达必佳0.1mg/d×14d降调节效果比0.05mg/d降调节好。Objective: To compare the effect of two kinds of down-regulation protocols by short-acting triptorelin in controlled ovarian hypersfimulation (COH). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 261 cycles. They were divided into two groups according to the different dosage and usage of short-acting triptorelin: group A, part-semidosage (n= 95 cycles); group B, semidosage (n= 166 cycles). Comparison was performed in the aspects of COH and pregnancy outcome between the two groups. Results: Compared with group B, the dosage of Gn, IVF fertilization rate and good quality embryo rate of group A were higher (P〈0.05). In group A, the level of FSH on the starting day of Gn and the level of LH on the day of hCG administration were lower than those of group B (P〈0.05). The implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and on-going pregnancy rate were all higher in group A than in group B, but there were no significant differences. Conclusion: Using 0.1 mg short-acting triptorelin for 14 d could have a better down-regulation effect than using 0.05 mg since the midluteal phase of the previous menstrual cycle.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4