试论“纯诗”理论与“国民文学”的深层悖论  

Remarks on the Deep Paradox of Pure Poetry Theory and National Literature

作　　者：李显鸿[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学,湖北武汉410081

出　　处：《楚雄师范学院学报》2010年第1期27-31,共5页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University

摘　　要：20世纪20年代中期"纯诗"理论的提倡者们如穆木天、王独清都曾试图指出他们的"纯诗"主张与自"五四"以来的"国民文学"理念并无矛盾。他们的这种辩解固然具有一定理论上的合理性,也反映了他们跻身"新文学"主流、获得"合法性"的强烈愿望,但是,"纯诗"与"国民文学"在语言取向、审美取向、价值取向等诸方面都具有难以规避的深层张力与深层悖论。Mid 1920s, ＂pure poetry＂ advocates such as Mu Mutian, Wang Duqing had tried to clear out that there is no contradiction in concept of their pure poetry with the national literature since ＂ May 4th＂. That argument has no doubt certain rationality in theory, which reflects their strong desire to occupy the mainstream in ＂new literature＂ and to gain ＂legitimacy＂, but difficult to evade the deep tension and deep paradox between the ＂pure poetry＂ and ＂national literature＂ in language orientation, aesthetic orientation, value orientation and other aspects.

关 键 词：“纯诗” “国民文学” 启蒙主义 

分 类 号：I207.2[文学—中国文学]